Thirty years after
the Persian War victory, Pericles commenced a monstrous construction
project—four major buildings on the Acropolis.
With the unbending support of the Athenians, the Propylaia, the
Erechtheion, the temple of Athena Nike, and the Parthenon stood to indorse
municipal pride, generate employment, and honor Athena for their victories
(Parthenon).
Between 447 and 438 BCE, architects
Ictinus and Callicrates completed the eastern-style Dorice temple in the
Parthenon, a temple dedicated to Athena, and smaller room to hold the
Delian League treasury. In regards to
the Parthenon, Perciles, the man assigned to the creation of the frieze
(sculptures within the top of the building), was a cultured man in philosophy,
literature, and the search for human meaning. With the help of master frieze sculptor
Phidias, he depicted two groups of cavalcade (men and horses) led by chariots,
ministrants, sacrificial animals, and heroes and gods that met in the middle
with Athena with two smalls girls with stools and a man helping a small child
(Adair). While the design of the
spiritual center of Athens appeared simple and straightforward, the architects
used curved lines and ratios, often 4:9, to perfect the design of the building
(Matthew). If intricacy of the frieze,
size of the structure, or harmony of the columns do not impress, the wooden
statue of Athena covered in gold and ivory surely generates a feeling of
magnificence.
Before discussing
interpretations of the frieze, let us appreciate the engineering that went into
constructing the Parthenon. George
Georgopoulos and Telioni Elisavet studied the curvature of the surface of the stylobate, the upper step of the crepis, the four-stepped platform of an
ancient temple, upon which stand the columns (Georgopoulos 154). This curvature was “established at the
temple’s foundation, or the stereobate, due to the transverse and longitudinal
inclination of the stylobate”
(Georgopoulos 155). Furthermore, to
determine the kind of mathematical curve that best describes the curvature of stylobate, the study uses least squares
techniques and their correctness checked through correlation coefficients to
conclude two types of models—a circle and a parabolic curve (Georgopoulos
154). Through the Parthenon, the
architects hoped to achieve balance and harmony to the eye of a spectator. While one would intuitively propose a design
with strictly straight lines, the architects used curved lines in addition to
ratios to create stability and harmony to the human eye.
On the topic of stable structures,
just as an innocent sailor sailing by Athens noticed the durable columns in 400
BCE, people of today also associate the Parthenon with the bold columns. These columns are referred to as the Doric
column, one somewhat heavier than the Ionic.
Muscular and swollen are words psychoanalyst Mark Adair used to describe
the Doric column because the entasis,
bulge along the line of taper, exhibits a muscular quality and the
unnecessarily massive width of the columns shows a swollen characteristic
(Adair). According to Adair, the Greeks
were sensitive to issues of masculine pride, and, also, honor was accepted as a
masculine trait. Thus, the purposes of
the Parthenon—to demonstrate civic pride and to honor Athena—contained
masculine tendencies, even though the building contained a temple for a
goddess. Other instances of male
sexuality persist in the depictions of Athena; she holds a snake in the eastern
frieze, and the 40 foot statue of Athena inside wears war gear, depicting
Athena. (I will let you use your own
imagination to figure out the symbolism behind the snake.)
Lastly, scholars purse further
understanding in the frieze, especially in regards to the ranks of cavalry. For example, Nelis argues that the north cavalcade
can be divided into ranks of seven or eight riders because the naked leader,
looking back over his shoulder, distinguished the ranks; however, Osada thinks
the northern horsemen are divided into 10 ranks of six riders each because
military groups often consisted contained multiples of six (Osada 538-546). The debate over the meaning of the
frieze—such as the role of each Olympian God that is portrayed on the east side
(above the front entrance)—creates constant discussion among academic
professionals.
Although the Parthenon
traditionally represents the democracy, art, and literature, the building also displays
masculine attributes, maintains a balanced appearance, and captures a story.
Works Cited
Adair, Mark
J. “A Dream in the Parthenon.” American
Journal of Art Therapy 29.1 (1990): 1-14.
Academic Search Premiere. Web. 17 Feb. 2014.
Building of the
Parthenon. 20 June 2007. Image. 18
February 2014. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVgfAd1Yz6M.
Georgopoulos,
George and Elisavet Telioni.
“Approximation of the Curvature of the Parthenon Stylobate Using Least
Squares Techniques.” Journal of Surveying Engineering 138.3
(2012): 154-159. Academic Search Premiere.
Web. 17 Feb. 2014.
Georgopoulos,
George and Elisavet Telioni. Figure 1. 2012. Photograph of online source.
Matthew, Roy,
Thomas Noble and F. DeWitt Platt. The Western Humanities. 1992. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Print.
Matthew, Roy,
Thomas Noble and F. DeWitt Platt. Figure 3.23. 2011.
PDF. The Western Humanities. 1992.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
Print.
Osada,
Toshihiro. “Also 10 Tribal Units: The
Grouping of Cavalry on the Parthenon North Frieze.” American
Journal of Archaeology 115.4 (2011):
537-548. Academic Search Premiere. Web. 17 Feb. 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment